CREATED reality ...versus FACTUAL reality!
Who exactly are the REAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION? The state? The secret services themselves?
Do
they apply such strict rules to prevent themselves from being
dismantled? Why do they know everything about innocent citizens – and
especially about researchers and whistleblowers – while we can find out
virtually nothing about them?
Take for example PETER THIEL mantioned on the EPSTEINFILES, and his all-seeing eye from The Lord of the Rings:
PALANTIR!!
Read about his collaboration with the Israeli intelligence service, on Epstein Island. https://youtu.be/X1XHEznAbxk?is=psuMKoD8oFLaLlU4
In 2011 Dick Schoof (then with the police) already signed the contracts
with Palantir. Why was there lying about these contracts? Something that
would be good for security surely wouldn't need secrecy? Why
blacked-out WOO requests and only disclosure at the end of 2025, while
the system has already been applied unauthorized for years? Predictive
analyses from this system label people as criminals who have never
committed a single crime. They receive fines, heavy regime or detention
in Vught – as with Arno van Kessel – even before they have carried out a
single executable act according to criminal law.
They can lock you
up without trial, solely on the basis of an anonymous witness statement.
This happens as a result of labels such as “conspiracy thinker”,
“sovereign” or “anti-government”. The same pattern is seen by the former
officer Alice Bosman in the labeling of former officers and lawyers
who, according to her, are exposing the criminal plan:
The coup via
false flag with the CIA project COVID-19, the genocide shot for targeted
depopulation, and the bioweapon. Thanks to the forced disclosure of the
Pfizer papers (not in 80 years, but now) the causal link could
according to her be proven between the deaths and illnesses caused by
the bioweapon EM0477 injection. That was done by Arno van Kessel.
After
he, together with Peter Stassen, had submitted his preliminary burden
of proof – and Arno in the meantime had been removed from the roll of
lawyers by what he considers foul play – he was, within a few hours,
held at gunpoint and taken hostage along with his entire family by the
heaviest unauthorized and illegally operating group (which according to
the former officer protects these real terrorists) and locked up in
Vught without trial.
Former officer Alice Bosman also exposed with
facts the real terrorist attacks on our people. She filed a report via a
“blue book” prepared by lawyer Arno van Kessel, with patents and facts,
in which the criminal organization was brought into view.
The court turned out to be unauthorized to assess the complaint about the rejection of that report!!!
The
House of Representatives and the Crown are according to the ministerial
regulation indeed authorized, but they themselves had an exemption for
the bioweapons. King and statesmen too, they are all sovereign.
What counts as a criminal act for the people is a privilege for statesmen.
In
the substantive proceedings about the bioweapons and their deadly or
life-threatening consequences, research facts, witnesses and experts are
refused.
The same applies to the at least five witnesses of the
former officer. These at least FIVE witnesses name the same suspect as
Arno van Kessel in his COVID-19 case, namely JAAP VAN DISSEL as the
perpetrator of ritual murders of children, child abuse and baby theft
from Bleuland (now Groene Hart Hospital, where recently CHIPSOFT came
under scrutiny).
The CIA project that supposedly started in the 1980s
in Bodegraven and has ties to Epstein, HEINEKEN, GERARD T HOOFT AND
PETER THIEL, mentioned on that list.
The statements of the FIVE
WITNESSES are systematically refused by police, judiciary and the Public
Prosecution Service. What happens is that JAAP VAN DISSEL files reports
against all the aforementioned exposers and SRM victims of the
Bodegraven case, who subsequently end up under heavy regime. Their facts
are systematically not investigated and/or not admitted.
The former officer but also victim Joost Knevel is systematically
intimidated by the police: sent away at the station, slandered and
intimidated via false reports. Video images and conversation recordings
as evidence. There is intimidation and public pressure via security and
police and the Public Prosecution Service and the COVER COURT JOURNALIST
Chris Klomp financed by Jaap van Dissel.
Who on his behalf
systematically slanders and libels the whistleblowers and as an agent
provocateur drags them into criminal law.
In the proceedings and via
(DPG) media etc. they are portrayed as confused, lost or aggressive. As
soon as attention is drawn to them, psychological violence is applied
immediately.
Jaap van Dissel and the lawyer financed by NautaDutilh ensure that the former officer is arrested and brought before the judge.
The charge: libel and incitement.
The arrest falls under the heading “threat” of which nothing remains.
Van
Dissel FEELS threatened – not by criminal-law threat, but by the
research facts that remain outside the proceedings and AI and that the
officer posted online in SELF-DEFENSE.
Nothing of what these victims, witnesses and the former officer bring forward reaches the system.
A CREATED reality versus the FACTUAL reality!!
Experts,
research facts, witnesses and reports brought in by Alice are refused
by the Public Prosecution Service / COURT OF GELDERLAND in the libel
criminal case against the former officer Alice Bosman.
Whose mouth is silenced by people who serve the criminal organization, the state and the royal house.
Lawyer
Cees van der Sanden (financed by NautaDutilh) and the mayors of
Bodegraven impose silence on her but also on the victim Joost Knevel
through blackmail practices with penalty payments. His exposés too, by
Wouter Raatgever and Micha Kat – now lead to a speaking and/or contact
ban.Murder attempts on the former officer as a result of this are
anxiously shielded.
Just search for the names of these whistleblowers:
Arno van Kessel
Niels Hoekman
Wouter Raatgever
Joost Knevel
Alice BosmanWhat and who is written about them? What happens when they speak, disclose?
What is the role of Chris Klomp, Sydney Smeets and Norbert Dikkeboom?
What do they advocate regarding child abuse!?
What do the whistleblowers advocate for/against?
Who keeps getting attacked and by whom?
Who
finances?What do you see about them? Usually a speaking ban, or they
are picked up as soon as they post something – for doxing, libel,
terrorism or sovereignty. Created facts to criminalize them and thus
silence them.
Take Arno van Kessel: on the basis of an anonymous
witness statement (from the state), without any trial, thrown into Vught
prison with the most heavily convicted terrorists. Life-threatening!
The witnesses and experts in his evidence regarding vaccination genocide / bioweapons are refused.
Also
the witness statements of the former officer (who are NOT anonymous
witnesses) that she wants to introduce after she has spoken to the
witness, are not allowed to reach the created reality of the
proceedings.
The anonymous witness (from the state) in the covid19
case had prior consultation with the dean. Proof of that lies with the
former officer. What was discussed?
Why is the witness statement of the former officer refused?
No
fair trial!!!?The same applies to the witnesses and experts in the
never-investigated Bodegraven case – the breeding ground of the children
of the parasitic families of the CIA project COVID-19.
Halsema and Plasschaert et al. – elite children of this project – learned... Whoever talks, goes!!!!
The ritual murder of children who had told at home about abuse… as proof!
Joost
Knevel the guinea pig, just like now our people. Guinea pigs of the
elite... or better said parasites. Who through their private deals,
closed with the UNELECTED thus positioned mayors, enrich a very select
group at the expense of the guinea pigs, the population.The deals:
Vaccinations (v Dissel, Gerard t Hooft)
Face masks (v Dissel, Bastiaansen)
Wind turbines (Timmermans / G v Brussel)
Tri state city (Anette v Bronsvoort)
Palantir (Peter Thiel)
Heineken
Chipsoft
Etc.The names mentioned on the Epstein list and/or involved in (srm) child murders, as non-disclosure agreements...
Because
whoever talks, goes!!!!Were those back then (80s Bodegraven) as
children prepared for the deals, victim or perpetrator of the project?As
long as they don't talk, in my view they choose perpetration.
Whoever
does NOT talk goes.... before a tribunal!!! In my view.So choose today
to DISCLOSE or choose for a TRIBUNAL!?Signed, Alice Bosman, former
detective officer, investigative journalist whose mouth is silenced,
blackmailed and on whom murder attempts have been made, because of
disclosure!Recent news that connects to this:
A group of criminal
lawyers has announced that they will no longer adhere to the strict EBI
rules (Extra Secured Institution, including Vught). These rules, which
have been in force since last November, make their work impossible
according to them because of extreme supervision.
By ignoring the rules
they risk conversations being cut off or being sent away. This plays out
exactly in the context of the heavy regimes spoken about above.The
criminal organization .
This spiritually and physically tortured former officer, humiliated, taken
hostage, slandered and libeled is tired....
Because what do you do,
combative ... but with a people as described by:Mark Rutte quotes
Abraham Kuyper:“At every successful attack on freedom, the state can
therefore never be more than an accomplice.
The principal culprit
remains the duty-forgetting citizen himself who in sinful
self-indulgence slackened his moral muscle power and lost the strength
for his own initiative”What do YOU do today.......?
